Foot Fetish Forum: Hailliewood contribution pics. Airbrushed to hell!

This is topic Hailliewood contribution pics. Airbrushed to hell! in forum Archive 07 at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=48;t=002733

Posted by Craigy boy (Member # 3340) on :

This is the worst example. really poor effort on the veins. She is lovely, as are her feet. Some one was going a bit overboard.
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/contribution/hailywood/20070914/HLY07091410.jpg

Posted by Skorpius (Member # 10122) on :

For Shame! [Cry]

Posted by You (Member # 2107) on :

not cool

Posted by Tadpole in a Jar (Member # 4402) on :

Yeah, I noticed that something wasn't right with those pictures.

What I think she needs to understand is that we all embrace imperfections and the infinite variations on women's feet and that no two members of the foot-fetish community like the exact same types of feet.

Posted by Creamysoles (Member # 9641) on :

That's too bad since she really has great feet and toes. I guess that's what happens when you apply too much grain removal effects.

Posted by LeDaemon (Member # 198) on :

I thought I would be the only one to notice that Craigy. I prefer seeing pics that aren't overly touched up with photoshop. Its one thing to change brightness and contrast if the shot is a bit dark, but using all the effects to erase blemishes, veins, patchiness in skin coloration is too much. The pictures look more like an illustration than a photograph.

Perhaps we can see the original shots "preshopped" to see the feet in their natural beautiful form.

Posted by Cain (Member # 8492) on :

Yeah i hate when things have to be faked. Hey Creamy you may have said before but who is your avatar ?

Posted by Bootster (Member # 25021) on :

way too bad, really nice toes!!

Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :

I'm a huge fan. Alot of foot fetish photos are just that...photos. There are some however that understand the subject and desire to bring out the beauty for all ro appreciate. Foot fetish pics are just pictures of feet after all. The art is in making them seem more than "just feet". I look at her pics and think hmmm the pictures are so tastefully done I wouldn't be surprised if even those that hate feet would find the beauty in them. A mainstream comparison would be playboy vs the more graphic porn magazines. One brings out the beauty of the female form so well that it's mainstream and not even seen as tasteless (for the most part) as opposed to the more detailed life like porn mags. It's funny, when I have a playboy out on my coffee table( I know i'm a bachelor!) the magazine gets more attention from women than even the guys. The women who aren't lesbians can look at the pics and appreciate the feminine form. I see the same thing with those pics..... beauty over sexy. But in the end it's all a matter of preference.
GQguy