quote:

---

This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.

---

BOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
 

---

Posted by Hunk (Member # 12615) on :
 
damnit it was removed. should try that site porntube or whatever
 

---

Posted by imasoleman (Member # 5044) on :
 
Well that sucked, I just watched it today
 

---

Posted by ahaaa (Member # 6288) on :
 
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling that Youtube automatically reviews videos that are linked from certain sites like Wusfeetlinks.com and decides whether or not to delete them. Because I watched this video yesterday and it was uploaded in April of 2006 and now all of a sudden it's gone.

Very fishy...
 

---

Posted by Martial Law (Member # 2564) on :
 
Conservative idiocy IMO. Old ladies with nothing better to do searching for 'sexy vids' and then emailing about how disgusted they were.
 

---

Posted by Outback69 (Member # 2217) on :
 
I'm surprised that Chriss hasn't given us an update on the status of this video...

I noticed yesterday that he was posting in damn near EVERY youtube thread that had been deleted.

We need a WU TUBE!
 

---

Posted by Chriss (Member # 17353) on :
 
* * * YOUTUBE REMOVED THE VIDEO FOR A TERMS OF USE VIOLATION. * * *
 

---

Posted by Chriss (Member # 17353) on :
 
You know, I'm starting to get the feeling that Youtube automatically reviews videos that are linked from certain sites like Wusfeetlinks.com and decides whether or not to delete them. Because I watched this video yesterday and it was uploaded in April of 2006 and now all of a sudden it's gone.

Very fishy...

UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, NOTHING FROM WU'S FEET LINKS WOULD EVER BE POSTED ON YOUTUBE ANYMORE.
 

---

Posted by killa (Member # 8564) on :
 
i know which video this was, and she wasnt 18 anyway. a moderator would have had to remove it.
 

---

Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
Not to sound like a perv, but a girl under 18 sucking on her toes is nothing compared to what you can find them doing on MySpace in their drunken splendor. People can jack off to anything, but it doesn't mean each one of those things should be classified as "sexual." If so, I am sure we'd all have to buy those shoe catalogs we had when we were kids when we hid our fetish, from the back rack at 7-11 with the rest of the smut.

Patrick
 

---

Posted by GATOESUCKER (Member # 5297) on :
 
My bad its hard to tell a chicks age this day and time....She looked to be of age to me...Sorry bout that
 

---