I was watching CBS 2 News last night. At first, they teased us about a man just sexually harassing a little girl in a library. Then when they reported the story later in the broadcast, they started it off by saying that the man who did this had a foot fetish. That's when my attention was really caught.
I wonder if anyone else in New York City had heard about this?
I think the guy has gotten away with one, unless he commits the same act elsewhere. Why? The last part of the story will tell us.
----
Do you guys think this will traumatize her to the point where she won't let any man play with her feet when she becomes an adult?
-- National
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
Damn, more bad press for us! And yes, I think it will traumatize her.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
*facedesk*
Great, another creep who will turn an innocent person against us.
...And I bet the creeps over at Footsniffers/DoSF are going to try to justify this. Someone should nuke that whole place.
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
That guy must've been there before to know that there's no surveillance camera taking video footage. Otherwise, he got real lucky that he just so happened to be at a library that doesn't keep an eye on what people are doing.
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
He should be shot. Plain and simple. Multiple times and left to bleed out slowly. No excuse for pedophiles whatsoever.
Posted by DeLoatch (Member # 22329) on :
No excuse at all for that crap. He should be punished to the fullest extent, and even that -- I don't think -- would suffice.
Posted by mjl1717 (Member # 2939) on :
Gross
Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :
That's sad and inappropriate. I have not heard anything about this, only thing I've been hearing in the news is the hurricane. Why were there no adults present in the children's area or suspect a male by himself walking up there? To do that to a seven year old is terrible, or any child.
Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
That guy needs to be kidnapped, thrown in the pricon cell, and let the prisoners have fun with his ass & feet.
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by National: Do you guys think this will traumatize her to the point where she won't let any man play with her feet when she becomes an adult?
Oh, most definitely. The interview footage showed a young girl who was very horrified (and even petrified in her own words) by the actions of this self serving fetishist pedophile.
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran: ...And I bet the creeps over at Footsniffers/DoSF are going to try to justify this.
It wouldn't be the 1st time they stuck up for sick sniffers who fondled shoes of underage girls. I remember them giving me hell once for denouncing a degenerate janitor who was busted for stealing girls shoes at a middle school. It was sickening to see the man's actions being downplayed.
As for this news story, it is horrific to see another sick man giving the rest of us a bad name. It is not only bad that he performed actions without consent, but he also performed those actions on an underage, which is like double bad.
God, I can only hang my head down and shake it when i read about reports such as this.
Great job being vigilant and spotting this story. I just hope we see less of these in the future, but I have been disappointed in my hopes for many years unfortunately Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
I know this debate comes up often.....
But how does this give us a bad name? I don't get it. If a guy grabs a girls boobs...does that give all boob men a bad name? it's all about self control and being empathetic enough to understand another person.
Before I start...touching a child is wrong. Touching anyone nonconsentually is wrong.
Ok. Back to my original point. No woman is going to loop a guy that she is attracted to that likes her feet in the same category as that guy. Ever. She'd argue vehemently against the parallel. Why? Cognitive dissonance. Humans intrinsically hate to hold two contradictory ideas at once. For instance: "Wu is undeniably attractive and likes feet" "people who like feet are weird". The woman that thinks this MUST change her mind so the logic works...she can't change attraction because you can't help that....she'll either think then that Wu is special and isn't like the other weird guys...or she'll think that fetishes are ok. Either way...she'll see a hard line between the deviant in the news and the guy she likes with foot fetish.
This has nothing to do with "us" unless you're one of the guys that compliments random strangers on their feet without knowing if they're attracted to them or not. Those guys should worry....i'll explain in another thread.
GQ
Posted by dbacks (Member # 26882) on :
What an ASSHOLE period!!
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
quote:Originally posted by octoberbaseball: Why were there no adults present in the children's area or suspect a male by himself walking up there?
That's what I was wondering. When I was younger I was never left alone in public places, ever. Even libraries. I had to be within the field of vision of a relative at all times. Not just to prevent sick shit like this from happening, but also to prevent kidnappings.
Regardless, I am confident this guy will be caught. I'm just guessing here, but I get the feeling him getting away with this incident will give him a confidence boost to try again and he may be a little more reckless, linger a little longer. He'll get caught and sent to a place where the last thing they'll fondle on him will be his feet...
Finally, I'm curious as heck to see what Hazel Sanchez's feet look like.
Posted by babeflover (Member # 2953) on :
quote:Originally posted by dougiezerts: Damn, more bad press for us!
Wrong.that is not us.most of us have girlfriends, wives and/or seek for over 21 years old women.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
quote:Originally posted by GQguy: I know this debate comes up often.....
But how does this give us a bad name? I don't get it. If a guy grabs a girls boobs...does that give all boob men a bad name? it's all about self control and being empathetic enough to understand another person.
Because foot fetishists don't exactly have the best reputation due to stories like this and our portrayals in media works.
Liking breasts are seen as "normal", so a story about a guy fondling a girl's breasts without her consent would not cause people to denounce breast guys like they would foot guys.
We're still a minority, and as you know, minorities are always subject to the worst stereotypes.
Posted by kingler (Member # 40920) on :
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: He should be shot. Plain and simple. Multiple times and left to bleed out slowly. No excuse for pedophiles whatsoever.
Yeah, a good way to punish a sexual crime is to have them murdered. Can I take a guess on your nationality?
The guys sick but killing? As a level headed human being living in modern society that's just a ridiculous punishment and makes me slightly worried about your own mentality and morality too.
Posted by BlackHxC88 (Member # 15094) on :
quote:Originally posted by kingler:
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: He should be shot. Plain and simple. Multiple times and left to bleed out slowly. No excuse for pedophiles whatsoever.
Yeah, a good way to punish a sexual crime is to have them murdered. Can I take a guess on your nationality?
The guys sick but killing? As a level headed human being living in modern society that's just a ridiculous punishment and makes me slightly worried about your own mentality and morality too.
so you're supporting the guy who did this? what would you do?
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
quote:Originally posted by kingler:
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: He should be shot. Plain and simple. Multiple times and left to bleed out slowly. No excuse for pedophiles whatsoever.
Yeah, a good way to punish a sexual crime is to have them murdered. Can I take a guess on your nationality?
The guys sick but killing? As a level headed human being living in modern society that's just a ridiculous punishment and makes me slightly worried about your own mentality and morality too.
LOL. Not ALL Americans think this way. This guy has some real mental issues. I was reading a case the other day where a guy had terrible headaches coupled with an attraction to underage girls. He never acted on them of course but it scared the crap out of him. Turns out he had a brain tumor. After chemo the tumor subsides and he regains his normal sexual appetite and no longer has headaches. A few months later the underage craving started again.....guess what? The tumor was growing again.
What's my point? We're nolonger in the dark ages where just shooting an individual is ok. Does the 7 year old food rapist need isolation? Yes!!!For a long time? For how ever long he is a threat to society. But! At the same time it's important to use science to figure out what is going on here and whether or not he can be rehabilitated.
As science gets better and better we find that we aren't so much controlled by spirits as much as we are controlled by the physical chemistry's within our brains. Sure there's self control....but what if I told you self control can be lost?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_jBFbCCleY&feature=related Tourettes....a mental disease where people say things that the normal part of the brain says not to say. Think you see a fat person...so your rational brain says "don't draw attention to her weight" but your brain instead sends the order "say something about her weight" which the sufferer does. I'm black...should I be offended by those kids saying the "N word"? If I was out and heard someone with that disease say that to me should I kick their ass? Of course not. Hopefully you guys see the parallel.
GQ
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
I am Canadian actually, where I am from doesn't matter. He didn't 'ruin' this girls life but he certainly altered it.
The fact that you questioned MY morals is in itself downright disturbing when we're commenting on a grown male ADULT sneaking into a CHILDREN's section of a library and fondling/smelling a 7 year old's feet and you guys think he should be "isolated"?
....... the fuck?
You think isolation is going to help him? Bullshit. What happens when say for example you don't get to jerk off for a week or have any type of sexual gratification for an extended period of time? That's right, it makes you want it even more!
Posted by Wrinklesguy (Member # 732) on :
Then there's the same creepyfootman guy who responds to all the posts having to do with children and feet all the time...page 1..strange coincidence he seems so concerned about this crime all the time.
bluetoe: Also if you get too much sexual gratification,etc..you want it more. Everything in moderation. Also agree that murdering someone as punishment would be over the top...but something a little more fitting would suit him..
Beware and VIGILANT of this guy posting beneath me, he is known for this type of behavior mentioned in this thread VVVVVVVVV
[ August 28, 2011, 10:06 PM: Message edited by: Wrinklesguy ]
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
It is those who accept this behavior who have the real problem. This man was wrong on every level. To condone or even downplay this man's actions is morally reprehensible and would even call into question one's own preferences. Be careful out there fellas -- there are many freaks in hiding, it seems (especially those who try wayyy too hard to mask it with legitimacy -- and BEWARE and BE VIGILANT of a certain guy who edits his posts previously in this thread!)
Some prefer to bury their head in the sand (as indicated previously in this thread) and others prefer to be proactive about necessary treatments and forward progress. I applaud those who do the right thing, which is to stand against these freaks who embarrass the rest of us.
[ September 01, 2011, 04:11 AM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: I am Canadian actually, where I am from doesn't matter. He didn't 'ruin' this girls life but he certainly altered it.
The fact that you questioned MY morals is in itself downright disturbing when we're commenting on a grown male ADULT sneaking into a CHILDREN's section of a library and fondling/smelling a 7 year old's feet and you guys think he should be "isolated"?
....... the fuck?
You think isolation is going to help him? Bullshit. What happens when say for example you don't get to jerk off for a week or have any type of sexual gratification for an extended period of time? That's right, it makes you want it even more!
I'm guessing you're calling my response bullshit. That's fine...but read the full post first before you go on saying things like that. I said the isolation as a means to keep society safe. The mental health treatment would be the means to actually help the guy. Isolation? Crazy idea since it's the policy we use for everybody that commits a crime....it's called jail.
You'll find as time goes on and we understand mental health issues better the "shoot em" approach will slowly subside to something more productive. I think it's far better to jail this guy and figure out what's going on in his head physically so we can prevent this stuff from happening again than unleashing the firing squad on him.
Mental health is a weird deal and NO ONE can be certain that this sort of thing can't happen to them in the future. Don't believe me? Read up on it. I dare you. You'll find that sometimes we are absolved of our supposed free will. Sometimes we are not...and that guy deserves to be shot.
GQ
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran: We're still a minority, and as you know, minorities are always subject to the worst stereotypes.
So very true and an unfortunately a real world factor that we must deal with on a collective scale.
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
I wasn't calling your post bullshit GQ. I just don't agree with isolation(jail) for someone that is willing to do what he did. Don't give me mentally unstable crap too man, all too often the justice system is too quick to jump to the conclusion that a person is "mentally unstable" and BOOM, off scot free!
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
Well I DO believe in isolation, just not outright murdering the guy. Well, isolation as in prison, not isolation IN prison. I think some time with some hardened criminals who know why he's there might be in order.
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
quote:Originally posted by GQguy: I was reading a case the other day where a guy had terrible headaches coupled with an attraction to underage girls. He never acted on them of course but it scared the crap out of him. Turns out he had a brain tumor. After chemo the tumor subsides and he regains his normal sexual appetite and no longer has headaches. A few months later the underage craving started again.....guess what? The tumor was growing again. GQ
Have you got a link to this research perchance? Sounds quite interesting...
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: I wasn't calling your post bullshit GQ. I just don't agree with isolation(jail) for someone that is willing to do what he did. Don't give me mentally unstable crap too man, all too often the justice system is too quick to jump to the conclusion that a person is "mentally unstable" and BOOM, off scot free!
They go to a mental home (or whatever the fuck they call them nowadays) either until they are deemed "treated" or they live out their life being strapped to a bed, doped up on meds. Not *exactly* scot-free...
Not to turn it into a debate about being pro or anti death penalty - I personally don't take the side of "OMG you're killing someone! DEMON!" - as seen in other issues such as abortion, but just think about it logically: he's causes a load of suffering; does he not deserve to recieve some suffering?
Death is pretty instantaneous, prison is a damn long time.
[ August 26, 2011, 08:25 PM: Message edited by: Andy-Laa ]
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
quote:Originally posted by GQguy: I know this debate comes up often.....
But how does this give us a bad name? I don't get it. If a guy grabs a girls boobs...does that give all boob men a bad name? it's all about self control and being empathetic enough to understand another person.
The reason why is a story like this is so "out there" to most people that they remember it. You could put this story and a bunch of rape stories out there and I bet people will remember the foot one just because it is off beat.
Sooooo, when that person finds out you have a foot fetish, that will be one of the things they remember. Now, an intelligent person will not hold you responsible for some sicko like in the story, but it probably will be thought about.
This is why I always say treat your fetish like something normal and don't be embarrassed by it. If you act like it is strange and creepy, most likely, others will too.
Patrick
Posted by John K. Kryton (Member # 36180) on :
Don't say that the guy has a foot fetish, he's a straight up pedophile.
And I have not heard this on the news around here, the hurricane things seems like a bigger issue.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
quote:Originally posted by John K. Kryton: And I have not heard this on the news around here, the hurricane things seems like a bigger issue.
Well, yeah. The hurricane has the potential to cause millions of dollars in damage. This is just a drop in the water by comparison.
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
Not sure what your point was...but it helps mine. Should the guy be released? NO! But i'm glad he's being examined. I'm glad that mental health is being taken seriously. This way we can see the signs early on. This murderer was a computer science engineer. No mcdonalds fry maker here. A normal guy. I think this is an example of this scenario being able to happen to any of us. What separates me from this guy is that I have loved one's that will pull me aside and say "GQ, something is wrong, see a psychiatrist...please". This was a normal dude....with a disease that went unchecked. If you have an irregular heart beat... you see the doc. If you have urges to kill squirrels, you suppress or hide it...till you do something unforgivable.
Again...i'm not advocating for this guy to be released to hang out with us. No. But the compassion and curiosity that we use to deal with these people must be increased. The argument "he had a choice" isn't always valid.
GQ
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
i wont talk about the story, bc its hgorrible if its true.
but am i the only one who thinks its weird for a 7 year old girl to say i hope he suffers till he dies?
most seven year olds are pretty forgiving. im pretty sure these words were fed to her, or shes just a dark child.
and it might scar her, but I dont think that she would end up a foot fetish guy anyway. why do you guys always think everyone will?
Posted by FootBoi88 (Member # 43020) on :
Darn Shame as for me I see this gentlemen using his excuse that he likes feet to fondle and sexually abuse minors. This kind of behavior should not be punished with a mere misdeamor. I say place him behind bars in a county jail for the night and let's see just how much he'll enjoy the inmates sexually abuse him. Lol
Posted by ucflyeah (Member # 32674) on :
I went to one of those Urgicare's a few weeks back and when I sat in the waiting room there was a young girl with her mother. She was probably 12 or 13 and had her flip flops off. Her feet, which I only saw as I set my phone down on the empty seat next to me, made me realize that I had to get up, go outside, fake a phone call, come back inside and sit in a different spot cuz I didn't EVEN wanna look. Not for one more second.
That's what you do when anything even remotely illegal or non-sensical enters your mind. You get up and RUN AWAY!!
This pervert needs a long prison sentence.
Posted by Girlgotsole (Member # 14405) on :
You have to supervise your children. This is why. There's perverts that don't have foot fetishes, too. But I suppose him having one is just extra food for the news.
Hopefully he'll go to prison for a long time and we won't have to hear about anything like this again.
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
quote:Originally posted by GQguy:
Again...i'm not advocating for this guy to be released to hang out with us. No. But the compassion and curiosity that we use to deal with these people must be increased. The argument "he had a choice" isn't always valid.
GQ
It is here.
He didn't choose to like little girls' feet, true...
1) But he DID choose to "[creep] around the second floor children’s section."
2) He DID choose to "engage her in small talk" so she'd let down her guard long enough so he could grab her feet.
3) He DID choose to take off when the girl ran for help.
So, he was looking to CREATE an opportunity where he could indulge his fetish (#1) which was why he was in that section in the first place.
He concocted a simple yet effective scheme to increase his likelihood of getting at this young girl's feet (#2), aka premeditation.
And he fled (#3) cause he clearly knows the difference between right and wrong and wanted to evade capture. He CHOSE not to stay, face the music, and get help.
All of those were CHOICES. If he didn't choose to like little girls' feet, and really who would choose that, he DID have a choice in concocting schemes and plans to indulge his fetish as well as a means of escape.
I'd agree with you if the opportunity presented itself and he took advantage. That's not what happened, though: he CREATED the opportunity. He went LOOKING for the opportunity and was not satisfied until he found it. He set a plan in motion (the small talk) to gain access to what he had been looking for. I find it difficult to believe careful and methodical planning is not a choice.
Honestly, I'm not a lawyer, but creating the means and opportunity, something he CAN control, to indulge in something he can't, it would seem like that by itself would mean put him in population prison, not a mental ward for study. Any lawyers here that can comment on that?
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by canIsmellYourFeet: he CREATED the opportunity. He went LOOKING for the opportunity and was not satisfied until he found it. He set a plan in motion (the small talk) to gain access to what he had been looking for. I find it difficult to believe careful and methodical planning is not a choice.
that is VERY true and VERY scary.
it is fetishists like these who need to be locked up and have the key thrown away.
this man is sick on so many levels and the fact that he thought out his crime in advance is more reason to keep him away from other women and children on the streets.
i don't believe that some sort of spell or trance took this guy over. he is a freak for sure and and will never be a functioning member of normal society. i vote he gets more than a misdemeanor!! Posted by Wrinklesguy (Member # 732) on :
Yeah what a "creepy freaky man" he is...this is terrible :/
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
We have all heard stories where a men have gone over the edge and took into their fascinations with little girls and have wound up paying the price for them. This story, however takes on a more "creepy" turn when he chooses to fondle only her feet. I cannot think of a time in where I've heard a similar story. This story is also troubling when you consider that the guy will most likely not get caught because there weren't any surveillance camera wathcing over the place. This has been a perfect crime, if there has ever been any.
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
quote:Originally posted by canIsmellYourFeet:
quote:Originally posted by GQguy:
Again...i'm not advocating for this guy to be released to hang out with us. No. But the compassion and curiosity that we use to deal with these people must be increased. The argument "he had a choice" isn't always valid.
GQ
It is here.
He didn't choose to like little girls' feet, true...
1) But he DID choose to "[creep] around the second floor children’s section."
2) He DID choose to "engage her in small talk" so she'd let down her guard long enough so he could grab her feet.
3) He DID choose to take off when the girl ran for help.
So, he was looking to CREATE an opportunity where he could indulge his fetish (#1) which was why he was in that section in the first place.
He concocted a simple yet effective scheme to increase his likelihood of getting at this young girl's feet (#2), aka premeditation.
And he fled (#3) cause he clearly knows the difference between right and wrong and wanted to evade capture. He CHOSE not to stay, face the music, and get help.
All of those were CHOICES. If he didn't choose to like little girls' feet, and really who would choose that, he DID have a choice in concocting schemes and plans to indulge his fetish as well as a means of escape.
I'd agree with you if the opportunity presented itself and he took advantage. That's not what happened, though: he CREATED the opportunity. He went LOOKING for the opportunity and was not satisfied until he found it. He set a plan in motion (the small talk) to gain access to what he had been looking for. I find it difficult to believe careful and methodical planning is not a choice.
Honestly, I'm not a lawyer, but creating the means and opportunity, something he CAN control, to indulge in something he can't, it would seem like that by itself would mean put him in population prison, not a mental ward for study. Any lawyers here that can comment on that?
Good response!
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by National: This has been a perfect crime, if there has ever been any.
Just to clarify what I think National is getting at: this is a perfect crime from the criminal's standpoint since he was able to escape with little trace. And it may also be viewed as perfect from the vantage point of a small handful of sympathizers earlier who might've thought it wasn't the guy's fault.
Those who support the creepy freaky things that this man did will probably one day feel the mother's pain if they ever know what it is like to have children and then learn of some stranger doing these things. I pray it never comes to that lesson for anyone.
Please stay vigilant and never tolerate anything even remotely as sinnister as this.
Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :
This guy is really sick. I mean why do it to a small seven year old girl? I mean it sure sounds like pedophile to me. It's even dangerous to do it to an adult without consent, but this is what gives us foot fetishists a bad name.
Posted by sickvik (Member # 1319) on :
Now I do candid recording,butI NEVER touch or converse with anyone. In fact, I prefer to be left alone when I am out. This is crossing the line big time because now you are invading other people's space and them personally. I have a very strong fetish,but I have NEVER came close to touching anyone,adults included. I think this guy needs some help.His fetish has gone extremely wrong.
Posted by Kwiksand1 (Member # 2390) on :
Posted by PublicName (Member # 12270) on :
some of my friends teased me about this, lol.
i can't believe some dumb fuck would even try to do soemthing like that to a CHILD. what do you think the internet is for? he could buy any article of clothing specially set for something like what he did, but he had to do something unforgivable to an unwanting and unsuspecting individual. and come on, kids? go to hell, fucking sad sack of shit
Posted by Ticklin' Terry (Member # 42500) on :
Back in the 80's there was a dude out in the San Fernando Valley who would hit the mall stores and ask the chicks behind the counters to show their feet. Some actually did. Many of these girls were less than 18. I was working at the Sears store then while in college. He came in there one day and security nabbed him because he reached down to fondle the foot of some 16-year we had in, get this, the children's section. Cops were called. .
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
^Man was charged with...? (Do you know?)
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
^^ Probably assault or sexual assault.
Posted by baalfootish (Member # 33991) on :
I second the shooting him notion. Hear hear. Burn his eyes out first, fust his nostrils together and then cut his hands off, don't forget to cut out the tongue and sewing his mouth shut after gelding the bastard. When this is all done bring a hottie in and have her rub her stinky ass feet on his maimed face while she talks very explicitly about how smelly her feet are and how she keeps them perfectly manicured and has painted her toes blue this week. Now when this asshole can't smell, taste, see, or fondle these sexi feet and he is on absolute rock bottom of his soul... Then shoot him.
Posted by baalfootish (Member # 33991) on :
To other comment bout sixteen y o girl. Did u really bring that up as some sort of comparison to forcibly fondling a SEVN yo girls feet? Hell in jersey that guy coulda had sex with a 16 yo legally. Hell I've been with a 17 yo bro (legal in nyc). But SEVEN? Wtf. Wtf. Wtf.
But back to the 16 yo for a second. I wonder andys question. What was he charged with? Moreover, (assuming he's a young guy under 25) would they have made such a schpiel if he had just sparked up a convo and gotten a number and started chilling with her? I think NOT, but say feet and its call the cops. Fucking pretentious
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by baalfootish: fust his nostrils together and then cut his hands off, don't forget to cut out the tongue and sewing his mouth shut after gelding the bastard. When this is all done bring a hottie in and have her rub her stinky ass feet on his maimed face while she talks very explicitly about how smelly her feet are and how she keeps them perfectly manicured and has painted her toes blue this week. Now when this asshole can't smell, taste, see, or fondle these sexi feet
OMG, now that would be true torture for a sniffer and this guy would certainly fit the bill as one of the most undeserving losers ever. It's a shame the courts would never approve such a punishment but that would certainly be fitting for him and others like him.
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Violent]](graemlins/violent.gif)