Okay, so I have to ask, lol. What impulsive purchases have forum members made, for the purpose of seeing feet?
I did this today, although luckily it wasnt that expensive. For some reason, even though I dont like her personality, I've always wanted to see Kate Gosselin of ""Plus 8" or whatever's feet. This week's Star magazine has a picture of Kate sitting barefoot on a step. The picture really doesnt show her soles, but it is a nice view of both of her feet, the tops of them. So, I bought it, lol, for three bucks.
Has anyone else ever done this, bought a tabloid because of one pic of a celeb's feet theyve never seen? I've of course bought many foot and leg mags in my life, with multiple pictures of hot feet, but this might be the first time I ever spent three bucks on a tabloid to do so.
Waste of $$$, or do people understand why I did it?
Mitch
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
A few times a year i'll buy a clips4sale clip late night after bar hopping when I havn't hooked up for a while. Done it like 6 times over the past 4 years. 10 bucks a pop. Sounds like alot whenever I buy one...but now that I think about it...it's alot less than most guys spend on porn.
GQ
Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :
I think I understand why you bought it. What I would try next time is look up the picture online first.
Posted by swman (Member # 11682) on :
I bought a Maxim when i saw Eliza Dushku on the cover lol. wanted to get a good look at her it was worth it I suppose
Posted by SOLEMAN 13 (Member # 33699) on :
I've seen Kate Gosselin's soles, and they looked pretty nice; the toes had a sort of stiff, arthritic look, but overall they were definitely doable.
To answer your question, yes, I have bought a mag. or two, that I wouldn't have normally spent money on, for a nice foot pose.
Posted by scrunchlover (Member # 21542) on :
When I was young, I had my mom to buy a book on gymnastics, as I was into tumbling. But those barefoot girls on the cover didn't hurt either.
Posted by DwreckSTL (Member # 35442) on :