They aren't attractive at all- plus how does a girl stand to wear them? You'd have to keep all your weight on your toes, leaning forward. Certainly wouldn't be comfy!
Posted by RPM (Member # 2895) on :
as a guy who loves seeing women in heels.. this is not one of those i'd like to see. i've seen much much sexier designs similar in concept. this one doesn't even look comfy at all.
RPM
Posted by FootLongSub Zero (Member # 19380) on :
Silliest things I've ever seen .... There are calf building shoes that have a similar design... These should strengthen her calves so she can kill your penis
quote:Originally posted by RPM: this one doesn't even look comfy at all.
RPM
Due to the shifted centre of gravity or even a easily possible shift... just give her a lil' nudge to send her toppling.... Imagine loosing balance whilst crossing a busy street? Probably safer on skates...
Posted by Mommie Dearest (Member # 18340) on :
Wow - I went looking through that webpage and found links to other shoes ...
Here are the pics of the shoes you were talking about and others!
To me the sexiest part of a heeled shoe is, in fact, the heel! Therefore, these are ridiculous. Thanks MD for sharing the pic of the flipper shoes, THAT is hysterical! Must come in really handy on those nights when you go out for a date and then immediately go snorkeling.
Posted by RPM (Member # 2895) on :
hysterical!
I'm with you Hailywood. the sexiest part of a shoe is the heel itself in the place it usually is.
now i gotta go swim (if i had a pool)
RPM
p.s. when i first saw the flipper shoe, it was tied to an ad... how to prepare for flooding.
Posted by little5 (Member # 26188) on :
I don't care for high heels at all. I like Birkenstock mules. I love to get behind a woman in the bank or the grocery and watch her slide her foot in and out of those things.
Posted by ozkar (Member # 13264) on :
wow, how the hell does she walk in those heelless things??
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
" I like Birkenstock"..... Comment by little5
Heresy !!
_fjb_
Posted by Fantasy Feet (Member # 29629) on :
I think these shoe designers got a little bored. all of them are ugly and I wouldn't be caught dead in any of them!
Posted by J.J. (Member # 24686) on :
Personally, I think they're well designed, they're elegant and shocking, as haute couture should be, though probably a bit wobbly as someone already suggested. As for comparing them with Birkenstock... Posted by A&F_FootDude_05 (Member # 2999) on :
Looks like a photoshop job lol
Posted by Mommie Dearest (Member # 18340) on :
I find them very hysterical and impractical. They are obviously only for "Fashion Shock Value".
The heel-less ones were suggested to be part of a "Calves Building" series of shoe, where women had to walk on "tip toes". Obviously that one didn't take off!
*phew*
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
The "Flipper-Shoes" might come in handy for the gal that I would invite to a dinner on my dock and she wanted to make a quick get-away.
MD, the second photo of the shoes with the heels too long, has a certain sexy "fetishy" appeal - kudos to the photographer - that is visually very nice; a kind of B&D severity to them. On a practical level, if my girlfriend wore those to bed, I'd be struck by fear every time I thought she was about to roll over.
Posted by scrunchlover (Member # 21542) on :
I can't believe the the human imagination sometimes.
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
.... There are calf building shoes that have a similar design... These should strengthen her calves so she can kill your penis ![[Tongue]](tongue.gif)
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)