posted
When it comes to rating feet do you have a criteria and it is strict?
I will admit that I am very particular and picky as hell with my foot evaluation... I have a strict ass criteria... You could give me the hottest chick in the world,,, if her feet don't pass,,, she's out... Perect absolute 10's,, are rare finds in my book... I'd say less than 2% actually...
I realize my criteria is off the richter and I'm too picky... But when I see some some of the reply comments on some of the picture posts.... talking bout "how hot her feet are", or "what they would do to those feet"... I'm like really?? WTF!! Dude, her toes look like they got beat up by a pair of vice grips!!
I know personal taste is a factor as well but do you have a criteria?? How strict is it??
Posts: 750 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not that strict. As long as she is a good looking woman who takes care of herself and her feet then she's ok with me. As far as looking at pictures and videos online, then I get strict.
-------------------- And today we're all brothers Tonight we're all friends A moment of peace in a war that never ends Posts: 1014 | Registered: Jul 2010
| IP: Logged |
I'm not too heavily picky, but I prefer 2nd toe shorter than big toe, lighter skin tone, shorter thicker toes, nails that don't go past the end of the toe, and a shorter heel. I don't like long, knuckly spindly toes or flat feet.
I know that sounds like a lot, but I'll give all feet a look if someone is willing to take the chance and show them off.
Posts: 769 | Registered: Aug 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's rare that I can't find at least something I like about a pair of feet, as long as they're well cared for. The imperfections are just part of life and they're beautiful. Now, a woman who lets her heels get thick and rough and cracked or generally doesn't take care of her feet is a turnoff even if her feet are cute.
posted
Hell, it's totally subjective, isn't it? As far as whether or not a certain pair of feet really strikes a person as "beautiful", or whatever descriptor you want to use.
For example, I bet I could name a model that I think has beautiful feet, and I could find a bunch of people who agree, and more than a few who think I'm an idiot with no taste.
People may disagree, but I don't see an objective basis for determining something that's entirely "in the eye of the beholder".
That said, as far as "criteria" goes...I'm not sure I have any. Oh, to be sure, I've got my preferences: med. to high arch, soft creamy skin, clearly descending toe length (though a longer second toe makes no difference to me), and a lack of calluses (or "damage"). I've seen beautiful pairs of feet that don't satisfy all of those, though, and it doesn't really bother me.
What really sets a beautiful pair of feet apart is how they "pop" in the photo/video. The beautiful ones just show up more brilliantly, if that makes any sense. Anyway, I know it when I see it.
Posts: 2828 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
I do. straight toenails and cut straight. well proportioned toes ans smooth as silk soles adn finally heels have to round flat heel look bad and crack easily
Posts: 2497 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree 100% with you aerodrew. Although my standards have relaxed just a tad as I've grown older (42), I still believe that only 5% of womens feet are arousing to me.
And yeah, the picture section is baffling on most days. If I find one or two sets of feet on the entire front page that I'm digging then that's a good day.
Still love Wu's though and the whole website in general!
-------------------- Always hopeful for a pretty pair of feet in my face Posts: 1955 | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree, I think about 5% of guys like feet and only 10% of women have pretty feet. Do-able feet. Criteria? Well it starts with size. Small dainty feet preferably. Whether you like tops or soles it begins and ends with toes. They must line up. Descend across at a proportionate angle. Too much angle ruins the look from both the top and bottom. Toe thickness has to be right for the width of the feet too, can't be so thin that there are toe-gaps. Too thin also makes the toes crush in on each other, so they don't make a perfect straight bouquet. Tips must be round and nails of course well taken care of and nicely cropped. A nice arch is a bonus especially if you are a sole man, as the arch makes the sole curvy and sensual. At this point a woman must take care of what she has been born with but keeping her heels soft and her nails well kept. Just my observation.
Posts: 22 | Registered: Mar 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote: What really sets a beautiful pair of feet apart is how they "pop" in the photo/video. The beautiful ones just show up more brilliantly, if that makes any sense. Anyway, I know it when I see it.
Agreed,
Pretty feet will indeed "pop" when captured via still or video.
As for preference I like meaty soles (w/ a full heel), medium length toes, and a medium height arch. They do not have to be perfectly smooth, but I do not like a lot of "texture".
As for size 8-10 is my personal "sweet-spot" but there are exceptions.
quote:Originally posted by aerodrew: But when I see some some of the reply comments on some of the picture posts.... talking bout "how hot her feet are", or "what they would do to those feet"... I'm like really?? WTF!! Dude, her toes look like they got beat up by a pair of vice grips!!
I totally agree with you Drew. Sometimes it boggles my mind some of the feet that some guys lust after. a lot of them are desperate and prolly have never even touched a pair of female feet so their standards are pretty low or some have never had a sweet pair of feet to play with so its like they take what they can get because the woman is actually interested in their fetish.
posted
It's always funny to see some guys talking big about other people's preferences, especially when they've got nothing to say in the photo threads they're so quick to denigrate.
Keep up the "good" work, gents.
Posts: 2828 | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged |