posted
Usually those articles you come across are ones that make us look bad or weird...not this one. I think people reading this will do a double-take on foot fetishes....it came our earlier in the month so it's relatively new...
posted
Ok, maybe she finds it politically correct to say that these are the things that make us differ from the pack but all the same she takes her distance, makes sure every body knows that it would NOT be her thing AND tells us about this friend who would only see his girlfriend as a pair of feet.
If I'd want to give foot fetishists a better name I would not speak about people who only look at their girl's feet, just like I wouldn't recommend the guy who only looks at women as pussy as a good lover.
However, I guess you're right, this is way better than usual
-------------------- Born again pagan baby, craving the moon, I worship Venus as she swallows me whole. Posts: 514 | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- V/R, FM9 aka Mr. Footbooty "She had real pretty feet. I was always a sucker for pretty little feet... Outside of her being pretty and hip, with a good body, her feet is what attracted me." - p. 39 of "Miles" (Davis) The Autobiography Posts: 8821 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm rather with J.J. here. It was a "politically correct" discourse colored by that smarmy "tolerance" that I hear from those who haven't a remote understanding about whatever unusual topic they wish to address. I notice that her "foot-hooker" had to use examples of foot-fetishists that generally portray them (US, come to think of it) as a pathetic lot, right down to depicting an older guy nearly killing himself for his foot fix (and an extra-large gratuity for his near-death experience).
Please, don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have some good press for foot-fetishists. I just have a problem with the angle of her approach.
Posts: 5067 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |