posted                          

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ben Del Amitri:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.

- Girlgotsole

---

These are excellent points. I don't generally pay much attention to "faceless feet" for many reasons, not the least of which is precisely that I prefer to see them as a characteristic of the GIRL - rather than a sort of inanimate object or disconnected body part.

The fact is, there are thousands of very fit and beautiful girls willing to show there feet with full body and face - so why waste time sifting through fantom photos of feet alone? Why accept a fraction of the experience, when you can simply and easily find the entire experience offered by thousands?

Philosophically, many people prefer Celebrating the girl along WITH (and because of) her feet - rather than objectifying the feet without regard to who they are connected to.

On a more simple basis (and the original intent of this thread), many people are patently against viewing such photos for the fact they are unable to know who (or what) the owner of those feet may be.

You mention "feet without identity" and that is VERY well put. As much as I love feet, I love women even more; and am unable (and unwilling) to separate the two, either way. Just as I rarely pick up a Playboy magazine (they always cut out the feet), I have no personal interest in photographs of feet without the girl.

---

Posts: 332 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                          

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.
- Girlgotsole

---

Posts: 1779 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                       

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
Now, I'm no homophobe. But, I can assume we're all good, female feet loving guys (and gals) here.

So, I'm going to say one of my worries and paranoias.

When a manly girl gets on here and posts her "size twelve" feet? Does that make any of you wonder? Like. I'm a size 11 in mens, and, converted, that's, I think, about a size twelve in womens.

I just wonder if any of you worry, as well, that we're targeted by transvestites because we're not looking at their crotches?

Just a curious worry.

Thanks,

Girlgotsole

---

I have wondered about the faceless ones on the large side, but ones with feminine faces and large feet (8-10 is my threshold but their are exceptions that are size 11) I don't.

Photoshop can morph men to women and vice versa, but I don't see this as a problem of epidemic proportions (yet). I think it will increase as foot fetish continues to firmly embed it self into the mainstream.

--------------------
Matt C. Nolan

Posts: 1357 | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged |