posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Toetapper:
I'm willing to admit that it is possible to fool me. To the best of my knowledge, that hasn't happened. I much prefer to have a face attached to the feet. I have made exceptions; a notable one would be "Brooke" who has posted here from time to time. There was a controversy for some time over her gender. Looking at her legs, I felt that she was female; later pictures that included her torso, pretty much sealed the deal.

---

Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by bluetoelover:
I don't want to beat the dead horse so to speak but the reason I leave my g/f's face out is just due to the whole "internet" preds floating around... I know I know whats the chances eh? But even if there is some small fucking chance that some fucking sicko out there would recognize her in public then I will not post her face on here. I'll catch shit for it I don't care but for the people that fling shit at me are exactly the ones that don't have a g/f or wife to post pics of so I say fuck off and eat shit and happy jerking

---

why post any pics at all if that's a worry? does she have a myspace or facebook?

if people worry about stalkers why do they have facebook, which shows your first and last name plus the city you live in, which makes it easy for a stalker to find them

i have wondered why does any guy share pics? what's in it for you?

i guess i'm not the sharing type

--------------------
quote:
----------------------------------
posted by Andy - Laa:
my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's

Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ophillia:
just wanted to put my two cents in. i PERSONALLY don't post my face pic for three reasons. one my husband has asked me not too. two i have small children and when they surf the net when they are older i don't want pics popping up. there are a lot of strange people on the net and i have had an incident where a private picture was posted on a site. there are a few and i stress FEW who have seen my face. i appreciate them keeping my identity a secret love ya guys~ i also think its shitty that men and TV try to dupe men. it puts the real people in a bad light. just as there are a lot of bad apples in the footguy barrell there are a few in the faceless foot photos as well. there are however numberous good footguys and faceless foot models that are the real deal, myself included. i look back as some of the other threads about the ff guys give yall bad publicity this is the same thing. don't judge everyone based on the actions of a few.

---

why is it embarassing to model your feet? if you modeled bathing suits or posed in playboy would you keep that a secret from your kids?

why do you post feet pics to begin with if you have to be so secretive?

nobody finds feet pics unless they look for them,
i doubt your children will ever see your pics, the world wide web is quite big

heck i post here and i'm not sure if i ever saw your pics

i don't want to seem like i'm hassling you or anybody but posting feet pics and hiding the face just doesn't make sense

it's like the girls that hide their face are just as insecure as the married guys that can't even tell their wife they have a foot fetish

both will die of embarrassment if anybody knows they have anything to do with a foot fetish

--------------------
quote:
----------------------------------
posted by Andy - Laa:
my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's

Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.

On the other hand, I do understand men wanting to post their wife's feet without showing their face. That's cool. Because their goal is to see what the other foot guys think and to chat about 'em. So, as far as you guys go, keep posting. Always a pleasure to boost a man's confidence by complimenting his wife's feet.

- Girlgotsole

---

Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                       

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.

- Girlgotsole

---

These are excellent points. I don't generally pay much attention to "faceless feet" for many reasons, not the least of which is precisely that I prefer to see them as a characteristic of the GIRL - rather than a sort of inanimate object or disconnected body part.

The fact is, there are thousands of very fit and beautiful girls willing to show there feet with full body and face - so why waste time sifting through fantom photos of feet alone? Why accept a fraction of the experience, when you can simply and easily find the entire experience offered by thousands?

Philosophically, many people prefer Celebrating the girl along WITH (and because of) her feet - rather than objectifying the feet without regard to who they are connected to.

On a more simple basis (and the original intent of this thread), many people are patently against viewing such photos for the fact they are unable to know who (or what) the owner of those feet may be.

You mention "feet without identity" and that is VERY well put. As much as I love feet, I love women even more; and am unable (and unwilling) to separate the two, either way. Just as I rarely pick up a Playboy magazine (they always cut out the feet), I have no personal interest in photographs of feet without the girl.

--------------------
Respectfully,

Ben



Malory in Signature

Posts: 5772 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ben Del Amitri:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.

- Girlgotsole

---

These are excellent points. I don't generally pay much attention to "faceless feet" for many reasons, not the least of which is precisely that I prefer to see them as a characteristic of the GIRL - rather than a sort of inanimate object or disconnected body part.

The fact is, there are thousands of very fit and beautiful girls willing to show there feet with full body and face - so why waste time sifting through fantom photos of feet alone? Why accept a fraction of the experience, when you can simply and easily find the entire experience offered by thousands?

Philosophically, many people prefer Celebrating the girl along WITH (and because of) her feet - rather than objectifying the feet without regard to who they are connected to.

On a more simple basis (and the original intent of this thread), many people are patently against viewing such photos for the fact they are unable to know who (or what) the owner of those feet may be.

You mention "feet without identity" and that is VERY well put. As much as I love feet, I love women even more; and am unable (and unwilling) to separate the two, either way. Just as I rarely pick up a Playboy magazine (they always cut out the feet), I have no personal interest in photographs of feet without the girl.

---

Posts: 6117 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ben Del Amitri:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.

- Girlgotsole

---

These are excellent points. I don't generally pay much attention to "faceless feet" for many reasons, not the least of which is precisely that I prefer to see them as a characteristic of the GIRL - rather than a sort of inanimate object or disconnected body part.

The fact is, there are thousands of very fit and beautiful girls willing to show there feet with full body and face - so why waste time sifting through fantom photos of feet alone? Why accept a fraction of the experience, when you can simply and easily find the entire experience offered by thousands?

Philosophically, many people prefer Celebrating the girl along WITH (and because of) her feet - rather than objectifying the feet without regard to who they are connected to.

On a more simple basis (and the original intent of this thread), many people are patently against viewing such photos for the fact they are unable to know who (or what) the owner of those feet may be.

You mention "feet without identity" and that is VERY well put. As much as I love feet, I love women even more; and am unable (and unwilling) to separate the two, either way. Just as I rarely pick up a Playboy magazine (they always cut out the feet), I have no personal interest in photographs of feet without the girl.

---

Posts: 1315 | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                          

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
I also ignore no face photos. But, man, you'd be surprised. I've seen some trannies in clubs or at my college that pull it off pretty well. But, yeah, whenever I see "asian feet" and there's no face a.) I don't enjoy it b.) How does that make them asian? Seriously, I could take a picture of any feet, and be like "Hey guys! ASIAN FEET!" And only a very select few lovers of feet would notice.

Girlgotsole.

---

Posts: 332 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                          

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mikey P:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Girlgotsole:
In my opinion, it's simple. I don't look at pictures without a face. Why? Because, to me, the face holds the personality. Feet are great. But they got to have the smile or the look to support them. Feet without identity, who needs that? Not me.


- Girlgotsole

---

why would that boost a man's confidence? can you even be called a man if you need other men to tell you "you're wife has hot feet"?

would these guys dump their girl if they didn't get positive feedback from some anonymous poster named "footjob dude"?

i sure hope not, i thought that was how high school girls thought, not men

---

Posts: 332 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged |